>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
新生肺透明膜病患儿表面活性蛋白及甲状腺转录因子的表达及其临床价值
作者:张莉1  江朝娜2 
单位:1. 海口市妇幼保健院 新生儿科, 海南 海口 570203;
2. 海南医学院 病理生理实验室, 海南 海口 571100
关键词:表面活性蛋白 新生儿肺透明膜病 甲状腺转录因子 
分类号:R722.13
出版年·卷·期(页码):2019·38·第一期(154-158)
摘要:

目的:分析新生肺透明膜病患儿表面活性蛋白B及甲状腺转录因子的表达,研究其临床价值。方法:选取我院2016年7月至2017年5月新生肺透明膜病患儿57例,按尸检档案分为膜病组35例,对照组22例,进行免疫组织化学染色用SP法。检测表明活性蛋白及甲状腺转录因子在肺泡及呼吸性支气管中的分布及表达意义。结果:对照组中较之病膜组肺泡腔内出现较少的红染物质、且肺泡腔较大、具有明显的扩张,边缘仅有少许的腺样肺泡,上皮细胞整齐排列于支气管中;膜病组中,少量的肺泡表达且分散。呼吸性支气管上皮表达较为密集,而对照组较观察组分布相对均匀。膜病组中,上皮表达较少,腺样肺泡表达显著。且具有较多的肺泡边缘扩张,上皮着色显著于呼吸性支气管中。且为串珠状排列;比较两组的光密度值:膜病组患者表面活性蛋白B在肺泡细胞上皮表达的平均光密度值为0.26±0.16,显著低于对照组的0.36±0.16(t=2.297,P<0.05);在呼吸性支气管上皮表达的平均光密度值为0.24±0.09,显著低于对照组的0.33±0.1(t=3.521,P<0.05)。甲状腺转录因子在肺泡细胞上皮表达的平均光密度值为0.35±0.12(t=3.521,P<0.05),低于对照组的0.39±0.2,组间差异具有统计学意义(t=3.309,P<0.05);在呼吸性支气管上皮表达的平均光密度值为0.35±0.1,显著低于对照组的0.4±0.17(t=2.521,P<0.05)。结论:发表面活性蛋白B表达减少与新生儿肺透明膜病密切相关,且发表面活性蛋白B的减少与甲状腺转录因子的低表达有关。激活甲状腺转录因子与促进肺表面活性物质B可进一步通过临床的诊治疗效。

Objective:To analyze the expression of surfactant B and thyroid transcription factor in neonatal hyaline membrane disease.Methods:From July 2016 to May 2017, 57 neonates with hyaline membrane disease were divided into two groups:membrane disease group (n=35) and control group (n=22). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using SP method.The distribution and expression of active protein and thyroid transcription factor in alveolar and respiratory bronchi were detected.Results:In the control group, there were fewer red-stained substances in the alveolar cavity than in the diseased membrane group, and the alveolar cavity was larger, obviously dilated, only a small number of adenoid alveoli appeared at the edge, epithelial cells neatly arranged in the bronchi, While in the membrane disease group only a small amount of alveoli was expressed and dispersed.The expression of respiratory bronchial epithelium was more denser, while the distribution of control group was more uniform than that of the observation group.In membrane disease group, the expression of epithelium was low and the expression of adenoid alveoli was significant.There were more alveolar margin dilatation and epithelial staining in respiratory bronchi.The optical density of the two groups was compared:The mean optical density of surfactant B expression in alveolar epithelium of patients with membrane disease was 0.26±0.16, which was significantly lower than that of the control group 0.36±0.16(t=2.297,P<0.05);the average optical density of expression in respiratory bronchial epithelium was 0.24±0.09, which was significantly lower than that in the control group 0.33±0.1(t=3.521,P<0.05).The average optical density of thyroid transcription factor expression in alveolar epithelium was 0.35±0.12(t=3.521,P<0.05),the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(t=3.309,P<0.05);the mean optical density of the respiratory bronchial epithelium was 0.35±0.1, which was significantly lower than that of the control group 0.4±0.17(t=2.521,P<0.05).Conclusion:The decrease of the expression of surface active protein B is closely related to the neonatal lung disease, and the decrease of the surface active protein B is related to the low expression of thyroid transcription factor.Activation of thyroid transcription factor and promotion of pulmonary surfactant B can be helpful for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

参考文献:

[1] 李敏才,时燕,李娜萍,等.表面活性蛋白B在新生儿肺透明膜病中的作用[J].华中科技大学学报:医学版,2007,36(2):169-172.
[2] 韩梅盈,邹卉,梁莹莹,等.早产儿新生儿肺透明膜病高危因素的研究进展[J].山东医药,2015(37):101-103.
[3] 张秀琴,周春梅,陈伟明,等.肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿肺透明膜病的临床研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2006,21(24):3400-3402.
[4] 江栋昌.肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿肺透明膜病的临床分析[J].中国医药指南,2012,10(2):12-13.
[5] 李敏才,李娜萍,王曦.表面活性蛋白B、甲状腺转录因子在新生儿肺透明膜病中的表达及意义[J].临床儿科杂志,2007,25(3):198-200.
[6] MALLOY M H,MCGOVERN J P.Hyaline membrane disease (HMD):an historical and Oslerian perspective[J].J Perinatol,2018,38(12):1602-1606.
[7] 刘新建,闫向真,韩艳梅,等.早期肺表面活性物质微创给药在早产儿肺透明膜病预防中的应用价值[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(9):1253-1256.
[8] STAHLMAN M T,GRAY M E,WHITSETT J A.Expression of thyroid transcription factor-1(TTF-1) in fetal and neonatal human lung[J].J Histochem Cytochem,1996,44(7):673-678.
[9] GUPTA A,ZHENG S L.Genetic disorders of surfactant protein dysfunction:when to consider and how to investigate[J].Arch Dis Child,2016,102(1):84-90.
[10] 淡云,卫文峰.肺表面活性物质联合鼻塞式持续气道正压通气治疗新生儿肺透明膜病的临床效果分析[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2016,24(8):112-115.
[11] STAHLMAN M T,GRAY M E,WHITSETT J A.Expression of thyroid transcription factor-1(TTF-1) in fetal and neonatal human lung[J].J Histochem Cytochem,1996,44(7):673-678.
[12] BECK J,MILLER M A,FRANK C,et al.Surfactant protein A and napsin A in the immunohistochemical characterization of canine pulmonary carcinomas:Comparison with thyroid Transcription factor-1[J].Vet Pathol,2017,54(2):767-774.
[13] KLEBE S,SWALLING A,JONAVICIUS L,et al.An immunohistochemical comparison of two TTF-1 monoclonal antibodies in atypical squamous lesions and sarcomatoid carcinoma of the lung,and pleural malignant mesothelioma[J].J Clin Pathol,2016,69(2):136-141.
[14] 刘翠青,曹蕾,郑华成,等.肺泡巨噬细胞核转录因子κB和核转录因子抑制物κB-α在肺透明膜病中的表达[J].中华儿科杂志,2006,44(8):602-606.
[15] 刘翠青,曹蕾,郑华成,等.肺泡巨噬细胞核转录因子κB和核转录因子抑制剂kB-a在肺透明膜病中的表达[C]//中华医学会第五次全国围产医学学术会议论文汇编.2005.
[16] CHEAH F C,WINTERBOURN C C,DARLOW B A,等.新生儿肺透明膜病中分离出的肺白细胞的核因子κB激活:与绒膜羊膜炎及脲原体增殖相关[J].世界核心医学期刊文摘:儿科学分册,2005(10):60-60.
[17] 杨舟,沈锋.戊乙奎醚联合机械通气对盐酸吸入性急性呼吸窘迫综合征大鼠炎症反应的影响[J].中国中西医结合急救杂志,2014,12(1):50-54.
[18] 张钰恒,张亚昱,梅花.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的遗传学研究进展[J].中国小儿急救医学,2016,23(4):259-262.
[19] 柯华,李占魁,于西萍,等.不同剂型布地奈德联合肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征疗效的比较[J].中国当代儿科杂志,2016,18(5):400-404.
[20] 廖翎帆,龚华,易明,等.不同起始量肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的多中心临床疗效比较[J].第三军医大学学报,2016,38(4):411-415.
[21] 刘凤,吴明赴,王飞.89例足月新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征危险因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2016,31(21):4449-4451.
[22] 王莉,王美芹,张建志,等.加温湿化高流量鼻导管通气对预防新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征拔管失败的安全性研究[J].中国医学装备,2016,13(4):31-35.

服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 414851 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

苏ICP备09058364