Objective: To explore the abundance of leucine α Changes of the expression levels of 2-glycoprotein 1(LRG1) and microribonucleic acid-155(miR-155) in sepsis before and after treatment and their role in evaluating the prognosis. Methods: The clinical data of 94 patients with sepsis in the First People's Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and set as the experimental group, and the data of 106 healthy people in the same institution during the same period were selected into control group. All participants were collected blood samples to detect the expression levels of serum LRG1, miR-155, interleukin-6(IL-6), C-reactive protein(CRP) and interleukin-8(IL-8). The levels of serum LRG1, miR-155, IL-6, CRP, IL-8 were compared between sepsis patients and healthy controls at admission. The levels of serum LRG1, miR-155, IL-6, CRP, IL-8 in sepsis patients with different conditions and prognosis were compared. The correlation between serum LRG1, miR-155 and the expression of IL-6, CRP, IL-8 in sepsis patients were analyzed. Results: Serum LRG1, miR-155, IL-6, CRP, IL-8 in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). Serum LRG1, miR-155, IL-6, CRP and IL-8 levels of patients with severe sepsis at admission and on the third day of admission were higher than those of patients with mild and moderate sepsis(P<0.05); Serum LRG1, miR-155, IL-6, CRP, IL-8 in sepsis patients with poor prognosis were higher than those in sepsis patients with good prognosis(P<0.05). The analysis of the receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the area under the curve of LRG1 and miR-155 for predicting poor prognosis of sepsis was 0.867 and 0.855, respectively. Pearson analysis showed that serum LRG1, miR-155 levels were positively correlated with serum IL-6, CRP, and IL-8 levels in sepsis patients(P<0.05). Conclusion: The expression level of LRG1 and miR-155 is related to the occurrence and development of sepsis. The increased expression level of LRG1 and miR-155 can lead to the aggravation of sepsis and the decrease of prognosis quality. |
[1] FONT M D,THYAGARAJAN B,KHANNA A K.Sepsis and septic shock-basics of diagnosis,pathophysiology and clinical decision making[J].Med Clin North Am,2020,104(4):573-585.
[2] 黄文丽,冬枚,杨道贵.镁离子转运蛋白1在脓毒症患者外周血CD8+T淋巴细胞中的表达及其意义[J].现代医学,2022,50(5):549-554.
[3] HE S,RYU J,LIU J,et al.LRG1 is an adipokine that mediates obesity-induced hepatosteatosis and insulin resistance[J].J Clin Invest,2021,131(24):e148545.
[4] 冉悦,廖品琥.LRG1、TLR4在脓毒症患者血清中表达水平及临床意义[J].右江民族医学院学报,2022,44(4):482-485,492.
[5] JIANG K,YANG J,GUO S,et al.Peripheral circulating exosome-mediated delivery of miR-155 as a novel mechanism for acute lung inflammation[J].Mol Ther,2019,27(10):1758-1771.
[6] 陈孝会,谢冰,邱丽霞.血清miR-155水平与脓毒症患者炎症反应、病情严重程度及短期预后的关系[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2022,29(6):1000-1006.
[7] 曹钰,柴艳芬,邓颖,等.中国脓毒症/脓毒性休克急诊治疗指南(2018)[J].临床急诊杂志,2018,19(9):567-588.
[8] 韩瑞萍,朱梦莉,陈慰,等.脑电双频指数联合血清Ghrelin对脓毒症相关性脑病的早期诊断价值分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2022,32(20):14-19.
[9] 陈雅,金琪,陈琪,等.老年脓毒症患者细胞因子谱及病情程度的差异性研究[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2022,38(18):2128-2132.
[10] 张艳,富威,张丽君,等.CD64指数、降钙素原与细胞因子在脓毒症诊疗中的价值[J].中国医科大学学报,2022,51(9):832-835.
[11] 高灵,张晓光,李俊,等.红细胞分布宽度变化对脓毒症相关急性肾损伤发生的预测价值[J].福建医科大学学报,2022,56(2):136-142.
[12] 胡元慧,汤冬玲,张平安.外周血单个核细胞Toll样受体4基因检测联合降钙素原对脓毒症的诊断价值研究[J].中国全科医学,2022,25(26):3246-3251.
[13] 文柯力,王鹏飞,杜虎,等.脓毒症患者高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T预后价值及升高的危险因素[J].中国医学科学院学报,2022,44(4):592-599.
[14] 贾启明,张涛,贺娜娜,等.脓毒症患者循环miR-21、miR-155变化与炎症细胞因子和心功能障碍的相关性[J].分子诊断与治疗杂志,2020,12(4):433-436,449.
[15] 孙振杰.miRNA-155通过调控小胶质细胞UCP2表达参与脓毒症相关脑病的机制研究[D].青岛:青岛大学,2021:20-25.
[16] HASHIDA T,NAKADA T A,SATOH M,et al.Proteome analysis of hemofilter adsorbates to identify novel substances of sepsis:a pilot study[J].J Artif Organs,2017,20(2):132-137.
[17] CAO Y Y,WANG Z,WANG Z H,et al.Inhibition of miR-155 alleviates sepsis-induced inflammation and intestinal barrier dysfunction by inactivating NF-κB signaling[J].Int Immunopharmacol,2021,90(1):107218.
[18] MIAO Y,WANG M,CAI X,et al.Leucine rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1(Lrg1) silencing protects against sepsis-mediated brain injury by inhibiting transforming growth factor beta1(TGFβ1)/SMAD signaling pathway[J].Bioengineered,2022,13(3):7316-7327. |