>
网站首页期刊介绍通知公告编 委 会投稿须知电子期刊广告合作联系我们
最新消息:
下肢创伤骨折患者康复自我效能与运动恐惧的关系:基于交叉滞后模型的纵向研究
作者:朱文娟  蒋大丽  吉洪娟  王羽乔  陆小庆 
单位:徐州医科大学 附属淮安医院/淮安市第二人民医院, 江苏 淮安 223003
关键词:下肢创伤骨折 运动恐惧 康复自我效能 交叉滞后模型 纵向研究 
分类号:R473.6;R683.42
出版年·卷·期(页码):2025·44·第六期(879-888)
摘要:
目的: 探讨下肢创伤骨折患者康复自我效能与运动恐惧的变化趋势,构建交叉滞后模型分析二者随时间变化的交互作用。方法: 便利抽样法选取2023年1月至2024年8月本院收治的下肢创伤骨折患者。采用中文版康复自我效能感量表(SER)、恐动症Tampa评分量表(TSK)调查患者术后首次功能锻炼时(T1)、术后3个月(T2)、术后6个月(T3)的康复自我效能与运动恐惧水平。不同时间点康复自我效能、运动恐惧比较采用重复测量方差分析;康复自我效能与运动恐惧的相关性采用Pearson相关分析;Mplus 8.3软件构建交叉滞后模型分析康复自我效能与运动恐惧的纵向作用关系。结果: 231例患者完成研究。T1~T3时,康复自我效能评分依次为(70.74±5.44)、(85.94±6.27)、(91.60±6.07)分,运动恐惧评分依次为(42.39±5.05)、(34.11±3.96)、(31.64±4.12)分,康复自我效能评分总体呈增高趋势,运动恐惧评分总体呈降低趋势,不同时点成对比较均差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。Pearson相关分析显示,T1、T2、T3时点的康复自我效能与T1、T2、T3时点的运动恐惧均呈负相关(均P<0.01),变量间存在同步相关性;各变量交叉时点的评分结果也具有相关性(均P<0.01)。交叉滞后模型(控制了性别、年龄、致伤原因、下肢骨折部位、疼痛程度)显示,模型拟合参数卡方/自由度(χ2/df)=1.250,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)=0.033,比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.995,塔克-刘易斯指数(TLI)=0.949,标准化残差均方根(SRMR)=0.017;T2运动恐惧随着T1康复自我效能水平升高而降低(β=-0.232,P=0.001),T3运动恐惧随着T2康复自我效能水平升高而降低(β=-0.249,P<0.001);而T2康复自我效能随着T1运动恐惧水平升高而降低(β=-0.237,P<0.001),T3康复自我效能随着T2运动恐惧水平升高而降低(β=-0.188,P=0.004)。结论: 下肢创伤骨折患者术后6个月内康复自我效能与运动恐惧水平呈动态变化,二者存在纵向交互预测关系。医护人员应该关注其动态变化特征,结合交互预测关系优化阶段性的干预策略,提高康复自我效能,降低运动恐惧水平,实现良性循环。
Objective: To explore the changing trends of rehabilitation self-efficacy and kinesiophobia in patients with lower extremity traumatic fractures, and to construct a cross-lagged model to analyze the interaction between the two over time. Methods: The patients with lower extremity traumatic fractures admitted to our hospital from January 2023 to August 2024 were selected by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the Self-efficacy for Rehabilitation Outcome Scale(SER) and Trampa Scale for Kinesiophobia(TSK) were used to investigate the levels of rehabilitation self-efficacy and kinesiophobia of the patients at the first functional exercise after surgery(T1), 3 months after surgery(T2), and 6 months after surgery(T3). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare rehabilitation self-efficacy and kinesiophobia at different time points. The correlation between rehabilitation self-efficacy and kinesiophobia was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis. The Mplus 8.3 software was used to construct a cross-lagged model to analyze the longitudinal relationship between rehabilitation self-efficacy and kinesiophobia. Results: 231 patients completed the study. From T1 to T3, the scores of rehabilitation self-efficacy were(70.74±5.44) points,(85.94±6.27) points, and(91.60±6.07) points respectively, and the scores of kinesiophobia were(42.39±5.05) points,(34.11±3.96) points, and(31.64±4.12) points respectively. The scores of rehabilitation self-efficacy generally showed an increasing trend, while the scores of kinesiophobia generally showed a decreasing trend. There were statistically significant differences in pairwise comparisons at different time points(all P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the rehabilitation self-efficacy at time points T1, T2, and T3 was negatively correlated with kinesiophobia at time points T1, T2, and T3(all P<0.01), and there was a synchronous correlation among the variables. The scoring results at the intersection time points of each variable were also correlated(all P<0.01). The cross-lagged model(controlling for gender, age, cause of injury, location of lower extremity fracture, and degree of pain) showed that the model fitting parameters chi-square/degree of freedom(χ2/df)=1.250, root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)=0.033, comparative fit index(CFI)=0.995, tucker-lewis index(TLI)=0.949, and standardized root mean square residual(SRMR)=0.017; T2 kinesiophobia decreased with the increase of T1 rehabilitation self-efficacy level(β=-0.232, P=0.001), and T3 kinesiophobia decreased with the increase of T2 rehabilitation self-efficacy level(β=-0.249, P<0.001). However, the T2 rehabilitation self-efficacy decreased with the increase of the T1 kinesiophobia level(β=-0.237,P<0.001), and the T3 rehabilitation self-efficacy decreased with the increase of the T2 kinesiophobia level(β=-0.188, P=0.004). Conclusion: The rehabilitation self-efficacy and the level of kinesiophobia in patients with lower extremity traumatic fractures within 6 months after surgery show dynamic changes, and there is a longitudinal interactive predictive relationship between the two. Medical staff should focus on the dynamic change characteristics, combine the interactive prediction relationship to optimize the phased intervention strategies, improve the rehabilitation self-efficacy, reduce the level of kinesiophobia, and achieve a virtuous cycle.
参考文献:
[1] ZHU Z,ZHANG T,SHEN Y,et al.The burden of fracture in China from 1990 to 2019[J].Arch Osteoporos,2023,19(1):1.
[2] WANG Y,WANG Z,CHEN B,et al.Global epidemiology of lower limb fractures:trends,burden,and projections from the GBD 2021 study[J].Bone,2025,193:117420.
[3] 徐榕璟,贺旭妍,贾守梅,等.骨科老年患者术后运动恐惧的范围综述[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(5):626-633.
[4] 梁琪,胡三莲,韦小梅,等.前交叉韧带重建术后患者运动恐惧的研究进展及护理启示[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(24):3049-3055.
[5] THEUNISSEN W W E S,VAN DER STEEN M C,LIU W Y,et al.Timing of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and preoperative pain are important predictors for postoperative kinesiophobia[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2020,28(8):2502-2510.
[6] 梁飞燕,王富珍.成人下肢创伤性骨折病人术后恐动症的影响因素及路径分析[J].护理研究,2022,36(7):1170-1174.
[7] 郦杭婷,沈娇妮,万昕瑞,等.髋膝关节置换术患者康复自我效能感在正念与恐动症间的中介效应研究[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(10):1177-1183.
[8] 闫怡静.社会支持对创伤性下肢骨折术后患者恐动症的影响路径研究[D].武汉:湖北中医药大学,2024.
[9] GRIMM K J,HELM J,RODGERS D,et al.Analyzing cross-lag effects:a comparison of different cross-lag modeling approaches[J].New Dir Child Adolesc Dev,2021,2021(175):11-33.
[10] THOEMMES F,MACKINNON D P,REISER M R.Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods[J].Struct Equ Modeling,2010,17(3):510-534.
[11] 万丽,赵晴,陈军,等.疼痛评估量表应用的中国专家共识(2020版)[J].中华疼痛学杂志,2020(3):177-187.
[12] KORI S H,MILLER R P,TODD D D.Kinesiophobia:a new view of chronic pain behaviour[J].Pain Management,1990,3(1):35-43.
[13] 胡文.简体中文版TSK和FABQ量表的文化调适及其在退行性腰腿痛中的应用研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2012.
[14] WALDROP D,LIGHTSEY O R,ETHINGTON C A,et al.Self-efficacy,optimism,health competence,and recovery from orthopedic surgery[J].J Couns Psychol,2001,48(2):233-238.
[15] 王海燕,许燕玲,胡三莲,等.中文版康复自我效能感量表的信效度评价[J].中华现代护理杂志,2014,20(3):268-270.
[16] MACCALLUM R C,BROWNE M W,SUGAWARA H M.Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling[J].Psychol Meth,1996,1(2):130-149.
[17] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特,等.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194.
[18] PODSAKOFF P M,MACKENZIE S B,LEE J Y,et al.Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J].J Appl Psychol,2003,88(5):879-903.
[19] BULLOCK G S,SELL T C,ZAREGA R,et al.Kinesiophobia,knee self-efficacy,and fear avoidance beliefs in people with ACL injury:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Sports Med,2022,52(12):3001-3019.
[20] JIANG Z L,CAI F Y,XIONG Z,et al.Analysis of the trajectory and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in elderly patients during the rehabilitation phase of limb fractures[J].Am J Transl Res,2024,16(9):4819-4829.
[21] PEAIRS E M,CHARI T,KUEHN S J,et al.The association of pre-existing mental health conditions and patient outcomes after lower extremity orthopaedic trauma:a scoping review[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2024,34(2):1111-1120.
[22] BRIGHTWELL B D,VAN WYNGAARDEN J J,SAMAAN M A,et al.Factors associated with long-term quadriceps muscle function after surgical fixation of lower extremity fractures[J].Phys Ther,2023,103(10):pzad108.
[23] 陈游,李斌,戴携,等.血清瘦素及骨转化指标与下肢长骨骨折伴急性脊髓损伤患者骨折愈合的关系[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2022,41(1):49-55.
[24] LUCIDI G A,DI PAOLO S,ADRAVANTI F M,et al.Kinesiophobia and high-impact sport activity are associated with a reduced rate of return to sport after high tibial osteotomy:a risk factor analysis of a young and active population[J].Am J Sports Med,2025,53(5):1068-1076.
[25] SONG L X,YANG L,LI Y,et al.Influence of health education based on the transtheoretical model on kinesiophobia levels and rehabilitation outcomes in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty[J].Heliyon,2024,10(12):e32445.
[26] 黄桂玲,张英英,阳佩,等.基于微信平台的同伴教育在膝交叉韧带重建患者康复中的应用[J].护理学杂志,2019,34(6):95-98.
[27] 赖婷,吴明珑,胡凯利,等.全髋关节置换术后患者运动恐惧轨迹的潜在类别及影响因素分析[J].华西医学,2024,39(10):1571-1578.
[28] JAYAKUMAR P,TEUNIS T,VRANCEANU A M,et al.Early psychological and social factors explain the recovery trajectory after distal radial fracture[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,2020,102(9):788-795.
[29] 李莉,申雅文,李德龙,等.脆性骨折术后患者康复自我效能感的影响因素及路径分析[J].中华护理杂志,2024,59(24):3003-3008.
[30] 张莉,张子茹,张彩蕾,等.全膝关节置换术患者恐动症水平变化轨迹及影响因素分析[J].护士进修杂志,2024,39(9):904-911.
[31] 毛雪,金鑫,赵溪,等.胫腓骨骨折患者术后发生恐动症风险的列线图分析[J].护理管理杂志,2022,22(3):168-173,185.
[32] 季长高,梁媛,贾国红,等.高龄股骨颈骨折患者自我效能在术后疼痛与恐动间的中介效应研究[J].现代临床护理,2023,22(10):35-41.
[33] TERRADAS-MONLLOR M,BELTRAN-ALACREU H,OCHANDORENA-ACHA M,et al.Preoperative home-based multimodal physiotherapy in patients scheduled for a knee arthroplasty who catastrophize about their pain:a randomized controlled trial[J].J Clin Med,2025,14(1):268.
服务与反馈:
文章下载】【发表评论】【查看评论】【加入收藏
提示:您还未登录,请登录!点此登录
您是第 555867 位访问者


copyright ©《东南大学学报(医学版)》编辑部
联系电话:025-83272481 83272483
电子邮件:
bjb@pub.seu.edu.cn

本系统由北京博渊星辰网络科技有限公司设计开发 技术支持电话:010-63361626

苏ICP备09058364